The results section presents the outcomes of experiments that have already been conducted and analyzed. It is a crucial part of scientific manuscripts in the life sciences and requires precise, objective reporting.
Start by describing the figures in the order of their panels, for example, beginning with Figure 1A. Use active voice whenever possible and write in past tense. If the order of panels disrupts the writing flow, feel free to rearrange the figures dynamically to improve readability. Tell a clear experimental story by briefly explaining why a specific test was performed and how its results led to the next analysis. However, focus only on the rationale behind the experiments, not on discussing the outcomes.
Comparing Results
Describe each panel with precision: specify the method used and the groups compared so the reader can easily understand the data presented. When comparing groups, always compare the test group to the corresponding control group, which serves as the baseline. Use consistent terminology for groups and objects as shown in the figures and legends to avoid confusion. Be exact about the observed changes, indicating the direction, for example, “protein levels in the test group were increased compared to the control group.” Only report differences that are statistically significant. If differences are not statistically significant, it is not a difference.
Precision and Objectivity
Avoid interpretative or speculative language in the results section. Terms such as “suggesting” or “assuming” belong in the discussion section. After describing all figure panels consecutively, summarize the results in a brief concluding paragraph to provide the reader with a clear overview.
This approach ensures a clear, coherent, and scientifically rigorous results section that transparently and comprehensibly presents your experimental findings.
Summary
Objectively describe results in the order of the figures
Only denote groups as different from each other if difference is statistically significant
